Ford Raptor Ecoboost Forum - Reply to Topic
Thread: Where the F-150 Lost its Weight: INFOGRAPHIC Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Raptor Ecoboost Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
04-25-2015 04:43 PM
boosted That wind tunnel test showing the difference the bed makes with aerodynamics might be part of a design change noticed elsewhere with other trucks.... but I wonder which ones.
04-24-2015 02:26 PM
siezn That makes sense, after all these years you'd imagine that they have worked on the front end quite a bit to allow it to funnel air properly.
04-23-2015 12:11 PM
Lundy Actually the boxier front ends aren't what does the most damage aero wise, its the drag behind that comes from the swirling air.

Some Examples

Quote:
For example, a new air dam below the 2014 Sierra’s front bumper successfully reduces drag because it directs air toward the ground and away from the truck’s rough underbody. And Sierra’s ducted flow path between the grille and radiator prevents air from swirling inside the truck’s front cavities.

Even the top of the Sierra’s tailgate and the center high-mounted stop light are optimized to guide air cleanly around the truck. And because Bloch’s team detected unwanted airflow between the cab and bed, new sealing has been added.

“We discovered that in the computational analysis we perform,” said Bloch. “The most harmful air between the cab and bed was coming over the cab and down through the gap, so we paid the most attention to that specific area.”




04-22-2015 05:14 PM
siezn I doubt there's much they'll change in design about those boxy fronts, it's a part of trucks, it's what makes a truck design a truck design, even more so as you go up the truck segment ladder.
04-22-2015 05:13 PM
Syndikat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackson View Post
I seem to remember that pick-up trucks just perform poorly when it comes to CAFE regulations. I figured that they bring down the average for the company's line-up. Perhaps I am wrong, but even so, trucks aren't the best when it comes to MPG and companies must have an interest in getting those figures down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by siezn View Post
Trucks themselves are just horrible in that department than anything else from the start, just due to the nature of its weight and size
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackson View Post
They also all seem so boxy at the front. I'm sure they could come up with a more aerodynamic design, but perhaps that wouldn't be as good for capabilities. It seems like a truck that has great MPG numbers would sell well since it would stand out from all the rest.
Can you two do us a favor and READ about how CAFE actually works. There are different standards in place, the CAFE you're complaining about pickup trucks arent held to, they are judged by their own criteria, above half ton are exempt from CAFE

Corporate Average Fuel Economy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How CAFE Killed Compact Trucks And Station Wagons - The Truth About Cars
Bigger Pickups Are Result of Change in Fuel Standards - Bloomberg Business

Quote:
For the past few years, a quirk in federal policy has made it easy for Americans to keep supersizing their rides: Under CAFE rules that took effect in 2011, bigger cars have lower mileage requirements. For the first 30 or so years CAFE was on the books, the rules divided the market into cars and light trucks but held all vehicles in each class to the same fuel-efficiency standard. Automakers that sold only gas guzzlers, whether big cars or big trucks, had to pay penalties. That changed with a reconception of CAFE that began under President George W. Bush in 2008 and culminated in rules the Obama administration promulgated for 2011 and beyond.
Its hard to be persuasive if you don't know what you're talking about



04-22-2015 02:58 PM
Jackson
Quote:
Originally Posted by siezn View Post
Trucks themselves are just horrible in that department than anything else from the start, just due to the nature of its weight and size
They also all seem so boxy at the front. I'm sure they could come up with a more aerodynamic design, but perhaps that wouldn't be as good for capabilities. It seems like a truck that has great MPG numbers would sell well since it would stand out from all the rest.
04-21-2015 03:18 PM
siezn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackson View Post
I seem to remember that pick-up trucks just perform poorly when it comes to CAFE regulations. I figured that they bring down the average for the company's line-up. Perhaps I am wrong, but even so, trucks aren't the best when it comes to MPG and companies must have an interest in getting those figures down.
Trucks themselves are just horrible in that department than anything else from the start, just due to the nature of its weight and size
04-20-2015 03:10 PM
Jackson
Quote:
Originally Posted by siezn View Post
American companies do just as well as their competition, they have to, to stay competitive of course.

Just because a brand makes pickup trucks doesn't mean they don't do as well with CAFE regulations. Where did you get that from? If what you're saying is true that means Toyota and Nissan don't do as well with CAFE regulations than other japanese brands because they make pickup trucks
I seem to remember that pick-up trucks just perform poorly when it comes to CAFE regulations. I figured that they bring down the average for the company's line-up. Perhaps I am wrong, but even so, trucks aren't the best when it comes to MPG and companies must have an interest in getting those figures down.
04-19-2015 09:36 AM
hewster Why surprised from the seats? They are some of the first things to go when people cut weight in racing vehicles
04-18-2015 03:48 PM
Lundy general foam information Foam types - definitions of foam types, qualities and common uses



This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome