2017 Raptor MPG / fuel economy discussion - Ford Raptor Ecoboost Forum
User Tag List

 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 Old 05-25-2015, 05:21 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
2017 Raptor MPG / fuel economy discussion

For the 2017 Raptor, what sort of fuel economy is everyone predicting? When do we know the official EPA figures?

MPG should be respectable thanks to the efficient 10-speed transmission and Ecoboost 3.5L V6 engine. The lighter wight should help too, but those large tires sure will be a drag.
PeakPSI is offline  
post #2 of 19 Old 05-26-2015, 04:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wouldn't call it efficient just yet. High boost engines under high load (like most Raptor owners MO) will consume far more fuel then a larger NA engine. The smaller engine has to work harder and use more boost in order to generate the same poke as the larger 'less efficient' engine.

The key to efficiency is putting the largest possible motor in the smallest possible car, hit the nail with a sledgehammer. We've ended up with an odd trend of the smallest possible engine in the largest possible car....



Lundy is offline  
post #3 of 19 Old 05-27-2015, 02:04 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
As long as I can get around town with at least 15 MPG, I'm satisfied. Any less than that, and I won't be happy.
PeakPSI is offline  
 
post #4 of 19 Old 05-27-2015, 04:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Fuelly shows 2015 F-150s with the Ecoboost 3.5 are averaging 16.2 MPG over 50,000 miles to date. 2015 Ford F-150 Mileage



Syndikat is offline  
post #5 of 19 Old 05-31-2015, 09:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
high boost events are going to lead this truck DRINKING. I'm actually wondering if under hammer time the old 8 isn't more efficeient then an always on high boost 6



Lundy is offline  
post #6 of 19 Old 06-02-2015, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 413
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundy View Post
high boost events are going to lead this truck DRINKING. I'm actually wondering if under hammer time the old 8 isn't more efficeient then an always on high boost 6
Funny, we could potentially save on the initial cost and running costs going for the older 8 if it overall seems like a better package for cost.

Extra money left over for goodies.
siezn is offline  
post #7 of 19 Old 06-03-2015, 12:54 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by siezn View Post
Funny, we could potentially save on the initial cost and running costs going for the older 8 if it overall seems like a better package for cost.

Extra money left over for goodies.
That's only if you're driving FLAT OUT everywhere. And considering most miles will be on the street, nobody needs to be driving FLAT OUT in a 2016 Raptor everyday around town. The occasional blast won't kill the overall fuel economy of the truck.
PeakPSI is offline  
post #8 of 19 Old 09-16-2015, 12:31 AM
Junior Member
 
2017_FORD_RAPTOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Smile

My prediction that the EST MPG of the 2017 FORD Raptor is between 24-26 mpg
ADDJake likes this.
2017_FORD_RAPTOR is offline  
post #9 of 19 Old 09-20-2015, 04:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2017_FORD_RAPTOR View Post
My prediction that the EST MPG of the 2017 FORD Raptor is between 24-26 mpg
Where would that put it in comparison to rivals? On par but not class leading right?
Jackson is offline  
post #10 of 19 Old 10-04-2015, 03:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 413
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd say that's just about enough to keep it competitive on paper and even enough to keep the EPA happy and off Fords back.
siezn is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Raptor Ecoboost Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome